01/05/2008 07:19:05 PM (1)
It's now a given that most multinationals are paying at least some attention to their ethical performance.

With the environment becoming such a big issue, the area of corporate responsibility is going to be under the microscope even more than in the past.

The problem is that there's very little performance measurement and comparative auditing between companies.

There are surveys and polls, but it's hard to find anything else that challenges and compares company standards.

It was therefore interesting to be send a press release from Covalence in Switzerland, who have been measuring and ranking companies on the their ethical performance for the past 3 years.

The company tracks performance by examining a variety of sources including the companies themselves, news media and non-profit organizations.

Covalence has just released its performance data for 2007 and there are some interesting findings.

The company provides three rankings.

1. Best Ethical Quote Score (positive minus negative news)

2. Best Ethical Progress

3. Best Reported Performance (How the company presents itself)

It's interesting and something of a challenge for US companies to see the foreigners, Unilever, Toyota and HSBC leading the way, with HP, Alcoa and Starbucks trailing in their wake.

On a cynical note, the US companies do a rather good job at talking up their own performance with Wal-Mart and Coca-Cola emerging as the leaders in that category.

Covalence Ethical Corporate Rankings for 2007

Covalence also found that in 07, the environmental impact of production, eco product innovation and anti-corruption policy were the leading areas of ethical responsibility.

In addition to the annual report, Covalence provides real-time tracking of ethical peformance.

Useful if you manage an ethical funds or work in the CSR or PR department.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, audits and quality standards are going to emerge as an important issue for the environment and corporate ethics this and its good to see someone attempting to provide some comparative data.





Posted by Ed Cotton
Tags: environment (18) audits (1) auditing (1) covalence (1) ethics (2) evaluation (1) switzerland (4) green (11)

Comments
Ethical Investing
I fully agree with the main idea in this post. I would also go a step further and say that the reporting by public companies as to their environmentalal, social and governance (ESG) activities -- as well as their ethical standards -- be 'standardized' AND that such reports be subjected to proper audits and available for all stakeholders to review. Only then can we know that greenwashing is not taking place and that we have ESG/ethical reports that can be relied upon and thus really able to do company by company comparisons. I've been following ethical and socially responsible investing for some forty years and since 2002 have a website that offers the latest global ethical and socially responsible investing news. Interested readers can find it at http://investingforthesoul.com/ Best wishes, Ron Robins
Posted by Ron Robins on 01/06/2008 10:35 AM
It appears you don't have Flash installed.
Email this article to a friend
Send an email to a friend with a link to this article. Items with an asterisk (*) are required.

Your Name:
*

Your Email:
*

Friend's Name:
*

Friend's Email:
*