Looking at this data, it provides some insight as to why the President acted as he did.
However, there's more to this story than meets the eye and more questions to ask.
- What type of banks don't people trust?
- What is it about banks that they don't trust?
I am sure Edelman have this data and it would be great to see it if they do.
Banks clearly have a huge issue that is in crisis proportions and something they need to devote a lot of energy towards. Simply ignoring the issue and hoping it will go away, isn't going help. These institutions need a whole way of thinking about how they need to relate to and communicate with their customers and beyond this need ideas that prove they are to be trusted.
Posted by Ed Cotton
A bank should only go begging to its customers for understanding if there was a well of support and a high degree of respect for the brand and the category. Anything short of a stellar reputation and it's going to end badly. Now is not the time for such a plea.
However, Westpac in Australia seem oblivious to current sentiment. The bank sent out an email film to its customers explaining in the most patronizing way how the financial system worked and why bank rates where heading higher.
Given what people have been through with banks and the endless press on bonuses and the stratospheric pay packages of banking's top level, it's impossible to understand how Westpac's customer base could be sympathetic to the plight of a bank who now faces higher costs for borrowing money.
One can just imagine how this film came to be, harried marketing executives believing that if only the ignorant public could understand the reasons why money now cost more, things could be better, taking this thought to their ad agency and getting them to make an "educational film". The problem here is that the voice is all wrong, there's no empathy, understanding or even a recognition of some intelligence on the part of their customers. The fact this made it though the system shows an institution with a very low EQ and one that fill find its little exercise in education ends up losing it a ton of valuable customers.
Banking still has a lot to learn from how to respond to the current crisis. It does not seem like any of them get it, most don't want to acknowledge the realities of a changed context and a changed relationship. Most of the recent marketing efforts fall short, they show a lack of an insight and an inherent desire to turn the clock back to the days of old.
Recent research data from Bloomberg shows that Americans are pretty angry with bankers.
"Two-thirds of Americans say they have an unfavorable view of financial executives. More than half say big financial companies, which are expected to pay record yearend bonuses, are out only to enrich themselves and also should not have received government aid. "
The incumbents failure to get it right, could leave the door open to a smart opportunist who gets exactly what the consumer is looking for now, doesn't show the same patronizing attitude of old and finds a way to provide superior services at a much lower cost.
Posted by Ed Cotton
"A decade ago, during Japan’s banking crisis, officials eventually managed to halt their woes by summoning senior bankers into a single (smoke-filled) room and imposing a common system to measure the rot.
It took them several attempts before they arrived at a credible number (and it was dramatically bigger than the first guess). But once they finally came up with a big sum, they recapitalised the banks – and rebuilt investor faith.
However, the problem that now haunts western leaders is that it looks extremely hard to replicate the same smoke-filled room trick. After all, this is a global crisis involving banks in numerous different legal and accounting regimes that answer to different bosses.
Moreover, the bad loan total is a moving
target: as confidence crumbles in the banks, the economy is weakening –
creating more bad loans. Even if global leaders could organise a single
“count”, in other words, it would almost
certainly be out of date by
the time it was completed."
Gillian Tett- Financial Times- April 1st, 2009
It appears the administration has started to win the communication war and achieved the goal of improving confidence. However, dealing with the reality of toxic assets might turn out to be tougher than anyone imagined.Posted by Ed Cotton

Posted by Ed Cotton

From Paul Kedrosky
Posted by Ed Cotton
"Is the global financial system headed for a meltdown? From Nobel Prize-winning economists to captains of industry, the world’s top experts are united by a common answer: We don’t know."
From Foreign Policy
Posted by Ed Cotton
